糖心网页版

Svetlana Gannushkina is standing up for the rights of migrants 鈥� including refugees and asylum-seekers 鈥� in Russia, and as such plays an important role in drawing attention to one of the most challenging issues of our time 鈥� in a year when the figure of 65.3 million people displaced globally. Simultaneously, the debate on refugee hosting is becoming across the West (and, ). In this situation, Gannushkina has initiated the , which offers legal aid and education to migrants. Gannushkina鈥檚 current engagement for refugees is simply an extension of her life-long commitment to justice, equality and historical reconciliation. She was, for example, a founding member of the Russian organization Memorial, emphasizing the importance of coming to terms with history as a key to present day rights, democracy and reconciliation. Gannushkina has also been a member of Russia鈥檚 Presidential . While a prize to Gannushkina would first and foremost be a prize for her remarkable contributions to upholding the rights of migrants 鈥� as well as for justice and reconciliation more broadly 鈥� it would also draw attention to the problematic record of the current Russian leadership, both domestically and internationally.

Second to the above peace treaty only, perhaps, the most notable diplomatic achievement in recent time is the July 2015 Iran Nuclear Deal (Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action). In January 2016, IAEA verified that Iran had completed its steps under the deal to ensure the nuclear program remains peaceful, and lifting of sanctions could be commenced. Half a year later, and we have seen a considerable ease of tensions, renewed diplomatic contact and 鈥� although slower than many had hoped 鈥� business and trade picking up. Many pundits speculated last year that the Nobel Peace Prize could well go to the likes of Mohammed Javad Zarif, John Kerry and Federica Mogherini. This year, I rather suggest that Ernest Moniz, the US Energy Secretary, and Ali Akbar Salehi, the head of the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran, are worthy and likely candidates. Serving as chief negotiators on behalf of the US and Iran, the two used from MIT to reach an agreement in spite of the differences and long-lasting grievances between their respective countries. They even list, and have received much of the credit for the (so far) considerable success of the Iran Nuclear Deal. A fine example of science diplomacy 鈥� the activation of scholarly competence to build bridges between people and nations, the Guardian referred to their collaboration as 鈥� and the world will hope to reap the benefits for years to come.

The Syrian Civil Defense 鈥� better known as the 鈥榃hite Helmets鈥� 鈥� could be an ideal candidate for in Syria鈥檚 all-encompassing war. A prize to the White Helmets would not be a prize only for humanitarian efforts, it would also draw attention to the remarkable 鈥� yet rarely celebrated 鈥� resilient forces of societies hit by armed conflict. Equally important, the White Helmets carry the whose political call for change was caught between President Assad鈥檚 military onslaught and the violent response of a wide array of resistance groups, including many adopting extreme worldviews and terror tactics. The commitment and sacrifice of the White Helmets have been widely noted (even with a ). This has inspired (not necessarily an advantage), but also that the White Helmets are a Western creation operating in sync with extremist groups (most certainly a misrepresentation), their 鈥渞eal鈥� mission being the ousting of Assad rather than the saving of lives by digging survivors out of the rubble of bombed buildings. Composed of regular citizens 鈥� mostly young men 鈥� the Helmets have increasingly had access to skills training supported by a variety of external donors, offered mainly in Turkey.

Could 2016 be Edward Snowden鈥檚 year? His role in alerting citizens across the globe about the extent 鈥� and the dangers 鈥� of electronic surveillance is undisputable. Even in the US, Snowden鈥檚 revelations have led to political and legal that increasingly makes the official seem untenable. In October last year, the where it called on its members to "drop any criminal charges鈥�, to grant Snowden protection and to prevent extradition, 鈥渋n recognition of his status as a whistle-blower and international human rights defender". Snowden was a contractor for the US National Security Agency (NSA) when he leaked enormous volumes of documentation to the press in the summer of 2013. Others, including Julian Assange and Bradley (now Chelsea) Manning, have reportedly been nominated earlier, but Snowden鈥檚 candidacy is stronger, given both his recognition that leaking needs to be balanced with a concern for the security of individuals, and his principled reflections on the debate on surveillance and security. Yet, the Snowden leaks , also in Norway, where speculations about his candidacy about whether or not the Nobel prize鈥檚 host state would allow him to come and receive the award without being arrested.

With armed conflict and war, sexual violence very often follows, both during and after actual battle action. Three individuals with a long-standing engagement against sexual violence are Mama Jeanne, Mama Jeannette and Dr. Mukwege from DR Congo. Through their church network, , leading the work of seeking out survivors of sexual violence all across the country, providing support and ensuring that they receive treatment and help. Gynaecologist Denis Mukwege, on the other hand, set up the in Bakuvu, dedicated to providing treatment to these women. Mukwege has personally treated thousands of women and is today a leading expert on repairing the physical damage from rape and sexual violence, and has been instrumental in drawing the world's attention to the brutality and consequences of these kinds of crimes. By awarding the trio鈥檚 local, grassroots and on-the-ground actions with a Nobel Prize, the Nobel committee has a chance to strengthen the visibility of sexual violence in war as a global problem.

For the sake of transparency, it should be noted that 糖心网页版 researchers are .