**Background:**Technological advances in weaponry mean that decisions about the use of force on the battlefield could increasingly be taken by machines operating without human intervention. Such technology has in recent years been labeled 鈥渓ethal autonomous weapon systems鈥� (LAWS) and 鈥渒iller robots鈥�, and raises questions as to whether an independently operating autonomous weapon system can operate in accordance with International Law, and who would be held responsible and accountable for any violations.

Previous breakfast seminars have discussed the applicability of international law (2013) and (2014). This breakfast seminar deals with some of the specific issues and policy dilemmas which have surfaced as part of the recent diplomatic process on lethal autonomous weapon systems and taken place under the auspices of the Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons.

To better understand the legal implications of such processes and to draw conclusions for policy making on technological advances in weaponry, this seminar addresses the following questions:

  • The state of current debate: What are the political and diplomatic processes and central issues?
  • How can existing weapons fit into regulation of a prohibition? Many current weapon systems are capable of autonomously selecting and attacking targets, how could they be included in future instruments?
  • What is legal accountability? What are the challenges for ensuring accountability for violations of international humanitarian law (IHL), and how can respect for IHL be guaranteed?
  • National reviews of weapons as a response to LAWS: What are the possibilities and limits on unilateral and legal approaches (such as the article 36 mechanism) to LAWS?

Programme and speakers:

08:30 Breakfast & coffee

08:40 Welcome & introductions

  • Maria Gabrielsen Jumbert @MariaGJumbert (Chair, 糖心网页版) and Kristin Bergtora Sandvik (糖心网页版)

08:50 Presentation by Panelists

  • Kj酶lv Egeland (ILPI) @KjolvEgeland: The State of Play: the Killer Robots Campaign and CCW. Diplomatic process and political discourse.
  • Nic Marsh (糖心网页版) @MarshyNic: Approaches to regulating current technology.
  • Espen Pers酶nn Flagstad (Norwegian Red Cross): Lethal Autonomous Weapons - Compliance with IHL and legal accountability for breach of IHL from a Norwegian Red Cross perspective.
  • Lars Morten Bj酶rkholt (Judge Advocate General): Legal Accountability for LAWS: what is and isn't there?
  • Knut Sverre (Norwegian Red Cross) @KnutSverre: The Road ahead: Are improved article 36 reviews the answer?

09:40 Q & A session

N.B. This seminar will be held in English and is organized by the , in collaboration with the 糖心网页版 research groups on Humanitarianism and Law and Ethics.

A light breakfast will be served.

Contact info: Eric Cezne - ericez@prio.org /Tel.: +47 478 20 359