The standard frame of security studies is to view Northeast India as a site of multiple 鈥渆thnic conflicts.鈥� In trying to unravel these conflicts, the focus has remained on the fault lines between the state and its alleged contenders, the region鈥檚 multiple nonstate actors. This special issue tries to look at the conflict scenario of Northeast India through a different set of lenses, in an effort to draw the focus away from the usual conflict histories, to direct attention toward the ideas that underpin the construction of Northeast India as a frontier zone and its people as 鈥渙thers,鈥� both internally divided and divided from the Indian mainstream. The 鈥渢ribal鈥� movements of Northeast India, and the patterns of conflict associated with them, are well researched. What this issue explores is how and why tribal political projects are created and pursued, and how to understand these projects, whether as strategies of resistance and survival, identity politics, or rival projects of extraction and exploitation. What do we find when we look into the enigmatic frontier as a 鈥渮one of anomie,鈥� a 鈥渟ensitive space,鈥� or a parapolitical scene that defies the taken-for-granted dichotomies between the state and non-state?
Kol氓s, 脜shild (2018) Northeast Indian Enigmas, Alternatives: Global, Local, Political 42 (3): 99鈥�106.
