糖心网页版

The wars of misconstrued opportunities and bad choices

Posted Thursday, 5 Mar 2026 by Pavel K. Baev

The ruins of a police station that is struck during U.S.-Israeli attacks in Tehran, Iran, on March 3, 2026. Photo: Morteza Nikoubazl/NurPhoto via Getty Images
The ruins of a police station that is struck during U.S.-Israeli attacks in Tehran, Iran, on March 3, 2026. Photo: Morteza Nikoubazl/NurPhoto via Getty Images

The shock waves from the new Gulf war are spreading wider and growing stronger, and overlap with resonance from the four-year-long Ukraine war. These wars are clearly dissimilar in the geography, correlation of forces and character of combat operations. What they have in common is a shaky rationale for starting and unrealistic goal-setting. Both are wars of choice rather than necessity, and President Donald Trump鈥檚 assertion of an 鈥溾 from Iran is no more convincing than President Vladimir Putin鈥檚 perennial claim that he had but to invade Ukraine.

The decision-making on starting these wars is shaped by the personalistic character of governance, in which subordinates and advisers are eager to supply the 鈥渄ecider鈥 with the information he wants to consume. A common flaw in war planning in such whatever-the-boss-orders war rooms is underestimation of the enemy鈥檚 strength and will to resist.

We know a great deal more about the blunders and miscalculations in the Russian war-making than about the yet-to-be-revealed shortcomings in the US designs for air war, and comparisons might appear to be far-fetched, but they may still provide some glimmers of analytical light in the proverbial 鈥溾. For once, oil and natural gas export is a key variable in the complex equations of both wars, as Russia and Iran are major producers for the global market, while the USA happens to be simultaneously the and the . At the start of the 2020s, Russia鈥檚 position on the oil market was so prominent that the start of the war in February 2022 from USD 75-80 to USD 120, but volatility decreased in 2023, and since 2024, the downward trend has become prevalent. In the first days of the new Gulf war, the surge in oil prices was moderate, but the closure of the for tanker traffic is certain to accelerate the rise.

The windfall of petro-revenues helped Russia to withstand the enforcement of unexpectedly severe economic sanctions in 2022, and then ensured the return to strong growth envisaged by the policy of 鈥溾. That impulse lasted for two years and by the end of 2025, it was completely exhausted, so in the last couple of months, the Russian government about the depth of budget deficit and the maturing trend of . With the first Israeli missile hitting Tehran, this desperation has turned to new hopes of a of oil export revenues, even if tankers of Russian 鈥渟hadow fleet鈥 are seized increasingly often, even by such law-abiding states as . Putin鈥檚 relief is Trump鈥檚 headache as American drivers encounter higher prices , always a major factor in the US domestic politics. Ups and downs at the stock exchange have always been a in Trump鈥檚 policy decisions, so his assumption that the Iran campaign could last is set to be tested by the negative reaction of investors and speculators.

Another mutually reinforcing impact of the two wars is the erosion and fragmentation of the global governance, with the UN being paralyzed into inaction in both cases. The UN General Assembly overwhelmingly condemned Russia鈥檚 aggression against Ukraine in February 2022, but the of the invasion was more carefully worded and gathered less support. The breakdown of the wider structures of the European security system caused by the Ukraine war produced a strong momentum for Western unity in the framework of US-led coalition supporting Ukraine. This momentum was exhausted during four years to such degree that the idea of 鈥溾 appears as far-fetched as the notion of 鈥溾.

Russia was deeply concerned about the potency of the Western coalition and sought to counter it by investing in building two alternative structures: the (SCO) and the . Iran joined the SCO in July 2023 and the BRICS in January 2024, and Moscow sought to utilize these organizations for deflecting the growing US pressure. , the chair of Russian Maritime Board and Putin鈥檚 long-time loyalist, argued for a show of BRICS naval power, and several combat ships from Russia and China indeed joined the Iranian navy in in mid-February 2026. This show of flag failed to deter the US operation, and the BRICS, as well as the SCO, has remained 鈥溾 in the first week of the new Gulf war.

Yet another odd similarity between the two wars can be found in the interplay between the combat operations and peace talks, which are on the US side conducted by the same : Trump鈥檚 old friend Steve Witkoff and his son-in-law Jared Kushner. From the narrow focus of the US-Iranian talks in Geneva, Russian experts deduced the probability of a limited first US strike targeting the nuclear assets 鈥 and were astounded by the real . Even mainstream Moscow that the Trump administration tends to use for the military preparations and that Russia must treat the peace talks in Geneva accordingly.

What produced a particularly painful shock in Moscow was the US-Israeli decision on in Iran in order to facilitate regime change. While Russia forcefully pursues the goal of regime change in Ukraine, it has never targeted President Volodymyr Zelensky or aimed to disrupt any visit of Western leaders to Kyiv. The story about Ukrainian drone attack on the Valdai presidential residence was exposed as a , but it revealed Putin鈥檚 obsession with personal safety, which is certain to be aggravated by the reflections on the sudden death of Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and his family.

The indirect but strong interconnection between the two devastating wars is set to evolve, and it is notable that during the fist week of the Gulf war, the intensity of Russian attack in Donbas and missile/drone strike on Ukrainian cities has significantly decreased. Neither war can end with a victory to one side, and the possibility of a fair and stable peace deal is as miniscule for Kyiv as it is for Tehran. It is not impossible, nevertheless, that a cessation of hostilities in the necessarily short Gulf war would produce a pause in the tragically long Ukraine war.

The costs of bad choices have reached such enormous levels that trasactionalism, with all its unsavory purposes and cynical bargaining, may help the stake-holders in restoration a modicum of stability to tame the war-mongers.

  • Pavel K Baev is a Research Professor at 糖心网页版
  • This text was first published by

Part of the series

Ukraine War

Related topics

Iran WarUkraine War
An error has occurred. This application may no longer respond until reloaded. An unhandled exception has occurred. See browser dev tools for details. Reload 馃棛